XTM vs SYSTRAN

Why translation teams choose the complete TMS solution

SYSTRAN does a decent job at machine translation when all you need is a quick text conversion. But once your team needs to manage full translation projects, keep quality in check, and actually collaborate across languages, SYSTRAN starts to fall short. XTM gives you everything SYSTRAN doesn’t — a full translation management system built for businesses that are scaling.

Book your 30 minute demo

3 reasons why XTM beats SYSTRAN

Full workflow control from start to finish

XTM manages the entire translation process, from setting up a project to delivering the final files. SYSTRAN just handles raw machine translation — you’re on your own when it comes to project management.

Smarter AI that you actually control

XTM’s Advanced AI Pack gives you transparency and flexibility. You can bring your own AI keys and see exactly how decisions are made. SYSTRAN, on the other hand, uses a neural engine with limited insight or customisation.

Integrations that work with your tech stack

XTM plugs into over 60 platforms, including CMSs, PIMs, and enterprise tools like Adobe Experience Manager and Salesforce. SYSTRAN’s integration options are much more limited.

Real results. Not just promises.

Businesses using XTM see faster turnaround times, fewer errors, and consistent quality across languages and channels.

50%

Reduction in translation errors

42%

Cost saving with machine translation

90%

Faster time-to-market

XTM vs SYSTRAN: What’s the real difference?

It comes down to what you need. SYSTRAN is fine if all you’re after is machine translation — converting text without any real process or project support. It’s built for raw output, not managed localisation.

XTM is built for businesses that need to run translation projects properly. That means automation, quality checks, collaboration tools, and easy integration with the systems you already use.

The difference really shows when you try to scale. SYSTRAN users often end up managing everything manually, bouncing between email threads and spreadsheets. XTM users get a platform that does the heavy lifting — handling project tracking, vendor coordination, and quality control automatically.

XTM vs SYSTRAN comparison

Feature

XTM

Full translation project management
Visual context preview
AI transparency and control
Quality scoring system
Team collaboration tools
Role-based workflows
Integration ecosystem
60+ connectors
Deployment options
Linguist assignment and management
Built-in vendor management

SYSTRAN

Full translation project management
Visual context preview
AI transparency and control
Quality scoring system
Team collaboration tools
Limited collaboration
Integration ecosystem
Basic MT integrations only
Deployment options
Linguist assignment and management
No linguist workflows

XTM vs SYSTRAN: Translation project management

Translating content isn’t just about swapping words between languages. If you’re managing global content, you need proper workflows, clear deadlines, review stages and team collaboration. That’s where the gap between XTM and SYSTRAN really shows.

SYSTRAN treats translation as a simple input-output process. You paste in text, pick your language pair and get a result. That’s fine for quick jobs or internal use. But when you’re running large scale translation projects involving multiple people, deadlines and approval stages, SYSTRAN quickly hits its limits.

XTM: The end-to-end TMS

XTM is built to handle the full translation lifecycle. It takes care of everything from creating projects and assigning tasks to tracking deadlines and managing reviews. Project managers can see what’s happening in real time, spot delays early and keep things moving across different time zones and languages.

All changes are logged, version control is automatic and nothing slips through the cracks. In contrast SYSTRAN users often rely on spreadsheets and email threads to stay organised. With XTM it’s all in one place which saves time and cuts out messy coordination.

Book 30-min demo
Workflow view showing translation, editing, and proofreading stages with colour-coded status labels for accepted, ready, and started

XTM vs SYSTRAN: Quality assurance and control

Good translation isn’t just accurate — it’s consistent, brand-safe and context-aware. This is another area where XTM and SYSTRAN take very different approaches.

SYSTRAN focuses heavily on machine translation. It does a decent job of generating text but there’s not much insight into how or why certain choices are made. There’s no scoring system to flag quality issues, no built-in review process and no tools to enforce consistency.

Next-gen translation quality control

XTM goes a step further by building quality control into the entire process. Intelligent Score gives you measurable quality data using industry benchmarks like MQM. You can track how translations are performing instead of relying on gut feeling.

Language Guard checks for sensitive information and ensures brand terms are used correctly. SmartContext shows translators exactly how their work will appear in the final design or interface which is crucial for things like apps, websites or marketing assets. Together these tools reduce the risk of mistakes and ensure content is right the first time.

Book 30-min demo
Image showing SmartContext preview—side-by-side comparison of source and translated content with visual indicators, helping translators work faster and with more accuracy.
Pricing Request CTA Banner London Background

XTM vs SYSTRAN: AI capabilities and transparency

Artificial intelligence in translation has moved beyond simple neural machine translation. The XTM vs SYSTRAN AI comparison shows how different platforms handle modern AI requirements.

SYSTRAN built its reputation on neural machine translation technology. The platform uses proprietary algorithms to convert text between languages, with some domain customisation available through corpus uploads. However, users get limited insight into how translation decisions are made. This black-box approach makes it difficult to understand why certain translations were chosen or how to improve results systematically.

An intelligent, AI-powered translation platform

XTM’s Advanced AI Pack takes a different approach focused on transparency and control. The platform supports bring-your-own-key integration with leading language models, giving you direct control over AI costs and data handling. Intelligent Workflow uses AI to trigger automated actions based on project conditions, whilst maintaining full visibility into decision logic.

The platform’s AI architecture is designed to be explainable. You can understand why specific quality scores were assigned, how automated routing decisions were made, and what factors influenced translation suggestions. This transparency is essential for regulated industries and organisations that need to audit their translation processes.

Book 30-min demo
isual diagram of XTM’s intelligent translation workflow, showing automated task transitions between translator, reviewer, and final sign-off to improve localisation efficiency.

XTM vs SYSTRAN: Integration and workflow automation

Business translation doesn’t happen in isolation. Modern translation management requires integration with content management systems, development tools, and business applications. The XTM vs SYSTRAN integration comparison shows significant differences in platform connectivity.

SYSTRAN focuses primarily on providing translation APIs and basic integrations for common applications. You can integrate SYSTRAN’s machine translation into your existing systems, but you’ll need to build most of the workflow management yourself. This approach works if you have development resources and simple translation requirements.

Plug into your existing tech stack with XTM

XTM provides a comprehensive integrations marketplace with over 60 pre-built connectors. These include popular content management systems, version control platforms like Git, ecommerce platforms, and marketing automation tools. The integrations handle not just translation, but complete workflow automation including project creation, file synchronisation, and delivery coordination.

The platform’s workflow engine allows you to create custom automation rules without coding. You can automatically assign projects based on language pairs, route content through specific review processes, and trigger notifications when deadlines approach. This level of automation eliminates manual coordination tasks that slow down translation projects and create opportunities for errors.

Book 30-min demo
XTM integration capabilities graphic

Try XTM, the smarter alternative to SYSTRAN

When you need more than basic machine translation, XTM delivers the complete solution your business requires. Unlike SYSTRAN’s limited MT-only approach, XTM provides everything you need to manage professional translation operations at scale.

XTM replaces manual effort with complete project control—from initial request to final delivery. You get advanced AI with full transparency, visual context to prevent errors, and built-in quality scoring to keep standards high. With 60+ out-of-the-box integrations, XTM connects to your existing systems so you can localize at scale—without reinventing your workflows.

 

FAQs

Yes, but they serve different purposes. SYSTRAN provides machine translation technology, whilst XTM offers complete translation management. Enterprises typically need both translation capability and project management, making XTM the more comprehensive solution for business translation operations.

No, SYSTRAN focuses on machine translation without built-in project management. XTM vs SYSTRAN shows clear differences – you’ll need additional tools to manage projects, assign tasks, and coordinate teams when using SYSTRAN. XTM includes all these features in one platform.

SYSTRAN uses proprietary neural machine translation with limited transparency. XTM’s Advanced AI Pack provides explainable AI, bring-your-own-key support, and intelligent workflow automation. XTM gives you more control over AI decisions and costs.

XTM provides 60+ pre-built integrations through its integrations marketplace, whilst SYSTRAN offers basic API access and limited connectors. XTM vs SYSTRAN clearly favours XTM for businesses needing extensive system connectivity.

No, SYSTRAN lacks role-based access controls and collaborative features. XTM was designed for team-based translation work with dedicated tools for project managers, linguists, and reviewers. This makes XTM more suitable for professional translation operations.

SYSTRAN provides no visual preview or quality scoring systems. XTM includes SmartContext for visual previews and Intelligent Score for objective quality measurement. The XTM vs SYSTRAN comparison shows XTM’s clear advantage in quality assurance tools.

XTM supports bring-your-own-key integration with leading language models and multiple MT engines. SYSTRAN primarily uses its proprietary neural translation technology with limited external AI integration options.

XTM scales from small projects to enterprise operations with workflow automation, vendor management, and business intelligence dashboards. SYSTRAN requires additional tools and manual processes to handle complex scaling requirements, making XTM the better choice for growing businesses.